How To Adjust PGS to EVS Precision
To make sense out of these 4-images it is best to left click, select "All Sizes" and study the original sized image.
I think the PGS (Prototype Global Shoreline) has the potential to be even better than what it will ultimately become. The algorithm used to generate the vectors used "Short Wave Infra-Red (SWIR) bands which provided the best shoreline delineation and an accuracy of about 50-meters". (See NGA White Paper). Correct! PGS is a major improvement over WVS.
PGS is what I have long discussed as my ambition, "to create an Enhanced Vector Shoreline" map of the world". Using Landsat-7 imagery, I would generate shorelines. And that is exactly what EarthSat has done. They have taken Landsat-7 ETM+ 2000 imagery and generated a Global Shoreline. At first look, it is impressive. Especially when you compare to WVS vectors (See previous post). At second look, it is still impressive. EarthSat has created a world shoreline that NGA makes available at NO COST! At third look, PGS can be better - EVS Precision.
Working with 2-sections of shoreline in Central America, I determined how much adjusting would be required to enhance PGS to an EVS level of precision.


38% of the vectices (49) had to be adjusted. The adjustments were small, a few millimeters, but when completed they transformed a very good shoreline into an excellent shoreline - EVS Precision. 5% (6) of the vectices were deleted. These were deemed,by me, to be unneccessary toward generating a quality product. Parts of the PGS shoreline contain strings of vectices that appear to be a programming anomoly. There are 8 to 10 vertices strung together along a 2-centimeter straight line. So, I deleted the extra vertices to correct the overplots.
OT: How To
























